DISCLOSURE: DUNSMOOR LAW IS CLOSED AS OF NOVEMBER 2, 2023. SEE DUNSMOOR.IO THIS INFORMATION IS TO PROTECT THE INVESTING PUBLIC. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE IS LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE.
TL;DR: Evans filed for a TRO and permanent injunction to silence me and the court denied it. On September 8, Judge J. Arthur Melvin III dismissed his entire case after hearing arguments confirming that my reporting is not harassment. My 19 page affidavit and 15 exhibits exposed Evans’ false DIFC claims Muskego police fabrication and Wisconsin in house counsel lie. His own book confession to federal crimes is now part of the court record raising perjury sanctions, and denaturalization risks. Evans and his lawyers got two rounds of arguments and still lost while I needed one. His legal campaign to silence me continues to collapse.
Full Affidavit here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ke6vclvug4vuk74t0h82z/2025.09.05-AFFIDAVIT-OF-JONATHAN-C.-DUNSMOOR-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-PETITION-FOR-PROTECTIVE-ORDER.pdf
I. Evans Tries to Shut Me Up & Prevent the World from Learning the Truth (And Fails Miserably)
Well, well, well. As I predicted in Parts 1-3, Cal Evans’ house of cards continues to collapse spectacularly. On September 8, 2025, I had the distinct pleasure of watching Evans and his high-priced New York legal team get absolutely embarrassed in Waukesha County Circuit Court.
On August 28, 2025, Evans filed a new case, Case No. 2025CV001677, against me, seeking a Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction seeking to take away any guns I may own (despite not filling out his own form correctly).
(Yes, it is only “Yes” or “No” and yes he failed to do that correctly. What a true “international lawyer” here!)
His legal team from Nesenoff & Miltenberg LLP (charging God knows how much per hour) thought they could waltz into Wisconsin court and silence me with some ridiculous harassment claims. As seen here:
(Note: Mind you, dear reader, most of these are either truth or substantial truth as a defense in that he is a self-confessed criminal in his own self-published book or they didn’t occur e.g., I never said he was gay. It now sounds like he is now saying he is gay and if that is him coming out congratulations but also look up what the word “partner” means in real American legal terms, Evans. I’m sure that is where you are confused.)
The court took one look at their TRO request and said “nope” and denied it. Then they requested a hearing which Judge J. Arthur Melvin III scheduled an injunction hearing, as required by Wisconsin law, on the same date as the conference hearing for his absurd defamation case (the absurdity is highlighted below with this TRO case), giving Evans’ lawyers a chance to make their case.
Big mistake on their part. Some would say nuclear-bomb level of mistake on their part.
II. Procedural Background
Evans filed his petition for harassment restraining order on August 28, 2025 (Case No. 2025CV001677) in Waukesha County Circuit Court. The court immediately declined to issue a temporary restraining order, instead scheduling an injunction hearing for September 8, 2025, the same day as a scheduling conference on his laughable defamation case.
On September 3, 2025, Attorney Rodman Wells Streicher of Nesenoff & Miltenberg LLP filed his notice of retainer on behalf of Evans. Two days later, on September 5, 2025, I filed my 19 page “Affidavit of Jonathan C. Dunsmoor in Opposition to Petition for Protective Order” along with 15 exhibits documenting Evans’ pattern of false statements and fraudulent conduct.
Evans’ petition contained numerous false and misleading claims in his supporting affidavit, which I will address individually in subsequent articles. For now, it’s sufficient to note that his sworn statements followed the same pattern of misrepresentation that has characterized his conduct across multiple jurisdictions.
The matter proceeded to a hearing on September 8, 2025, before Judge J. Arthur Melvin III, with Evans appearing in person with counsel and myself appearing by video conference. Following oral arguments, Judge Melvin denied the petition and dismissed the case.
III. My Nuclear Bomb Affidavit
Disclaimer and Disclosure: I’m sure Evans’ lawyers are going to claim I have a nuclear bomb now. I do not have, nor have never possessed, owned, controlled, had access to, wanted to use, or know how to use a nuclear bomb. This is called a plot device, you muppet, soon-to-be former attorney Rodman.
On September 5, 2025, I filed a 19-page affidavit that absolutely eviscerated Evans and his legal team. This wasn’t just opposing their petition; this was documenting years of fraud, false swearing, and criminal conduct that Evans himself has confessed to in writing.
1) The DIFC Lie That Keeps On Giving
Remember how Evans has been claiming for years that he’s licensed to practice law in Dubai’s DIFC Courts? (He still does on his website and LinkedIn at the time of this publication). Well, I had the DIFC themselves confirm twice that this is complete bullshit:
May 28, 2025: DIFC confirmed “Callum Tony Evans, Gresham International, and (a different scammer) are not currently registered under Part I or Part II of the DIFC Courts’ Register of Practitioners.”
August 4, 2025: DIFC confirmed again “neither Gresham International nor Mr. Evans are currently registered under DIFC Courts’ Register of Legal Practitioners.”
(Excerpt from the Affidavit above)
But here’s the kicker Evans’ own lawyers repeated this false DIFC claim seven times in their July 24, 2025 Amended Complaint, even after I’d warned them in April that their client was a liar, fraud AND had a documented history of lying to courts, as documented herein.
Plus, it’s in DIFC’s public directory and a previous publicly available case I made against Evans.
2) The Muskego Police Fabrication
Evans and his lawyers claimed in their amended complaint that the Muskego Police “contacted Dunsmoor and warned him to cease his harassing online activities.”
Complete. FING. Fabrication.
I obtained the actual Muskego Police report. It shows Evans walked into the station to complain about me, and the officers treated it as a civil matter with no criminal basis. There was no warning issued to me whatsoever. Evans’ lawyers swore to a falsehood in court documents.
(Excerpt from Muskego Police Department Roll Call)
3) The Wisconsin In-House Counsel Lie
Evans surrendered his Wisconsin in-house counsel registration in May 2024. But on June 4, 2024, he swore under oath in Waukesha County that he was still registered as Wisconsin in-house counsel for the Wyoming fraud case involving the scam Aubit/Freeway he wrote the legal opinion for. The best part, his own exhibit in his own defamation case that he brought himself proves he was lying! He’d already notified the Wisconsin State Bar of his resignation effective May 31, 2024.
(Excerpt from Affdavit)
IV. The Courtroom Legal Beatdown
September 8th was beautiful to watch. According to the court record:
1) Evans’ attorney Rodman Wells Streicher made his arguments supporting the injunction
2) I appeared by video and presented my opposition arguments
3) Streicher got a second round to try to save his case
4) Judge Melvin placed his findings on the record
Result: “For reasons placed on the record, the Court denies the request for injunction. Court orders Injunction case dismissed.”
Professional counsel from a major New York firm needed two rounds of arguments and still couldn’t convince the judge. I needed one round as a suspended attorney representing myself, and got the whole thing dismissed on multiple grounds including personal jurisdiction.
Winning.
V. The Criminal Confession That Changes Everything
Here’s the bombshell that should terrify Evans: In his own book “The Little Book of Crypto,” published September 1, 2019, Evans openly confesses to federal crimes:
“I paid a lot of my way through university rebuilding old PCs that I would buy online and then flip for a profit. Windows 10 was a hit at the time; PCs sold at inflated prices if they had it. I had a bootlegged version that I downloaded from a filesharing platform and flipped the PCs I had with that version on it.”
(Different one from the affidavit but same passage highlighted).
This constitutes federal felonies under 17 U.S.C. § 506 and 18 U.S.C. § 2319. Evans admits these crimes funded his law school education.
VI. The Immigration Consequences
Here’s why Evans should be sweating: Under U.S. immigration law, this criminal conduct constitutes grounds for denaturalization and deportation:
1) 8 U.S.C. § 1451 authorizes revocation of naturalization obtained through concealment of material facts
2) 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2) makes deportable any non-citizen who admits to crimes involving moral turpitude or aggravated felonies
The Department of Justice memorandum dated June 11, 2025, specifically identifies “felonies that were not disclosed during the naturalization process” as grounds for denaturalization proceedings.
Multiple immigration attorneys have confirmed: if Evans had disclosed this criminal conduct during his naturalization application, he would have been denied U.S. citizenship.
VII. Evans and His Lawyers Got Caught Red-Handed
I’d warned Evans’ attorneys on April 11, 2025, in writing about their client’s false statements. I specifically told them that continuing to pursue filings based on these misrepresentations would constitute fraud upon the court.
They ignored the warning and filed the Amended Complaint anyway, repeating the false DIFC claims seven times. Attorney Rodman Streicher, who previously served as a Special Prosecutor in the Outagamie County District Attorney’s Office, should have known better.
VIII. ICEING vs. Swatting: Evans’ Failed Legal Theory
Evans apparently tried to characterize my reporting activities as some form of unlawful conduct they termed “ICEING” and compared it to swatting. This legal theory failed completely.
The distinction is crucial: swatting involves making false emergency reports to trigger dangerous police responses. Reporting suspected fraudulent conduct to appropriate regulatory authorities is not only legal but often required. Judge Melvin saw right through this nonsense.
IX. What This Means Going Forward
This ruling validates that my reporting on Evans’ fraudulent conduct does not constitute harassment under Wisconsin law. Evans can’t use the courts to silence legitimate criticism of his business practices and false credentials.
More importantly, the evidence of his false sworn statements across multiple jurisdictions and his published confession to criminal conduct during the naturalization process raises serious questions about perjury charges and immigration consequences.
Evans’ high-priced legal team’s complete failure represents a fundamental breakdown in legal judgment. They couldn’t convince a judge that basic regulatory reporting constitutes harassment, even with a professional litigator making two rounds of arguments against a suspended attorney appearing by video.
X. Why This Pattern Demands Sanctions and Bar Discipline
The injunction and hearing revealed the larger fraudulent scheme. This wasn’t about legitimate harassment concerns; this was about forum shopping and attempting to manipulate judicial proceedings through procedural gamesmanship.
When you combine the scheduling manipulation with:
• Repeated false sworn statements across multiple jurisdictions
• Ignoring written warnings about client perjury from opposing counsel
• Filing complaints containing known falsehoods after receiving explicit notice
• A pattern of misrepresentation spanning years and multiple court systems
• Client admissions to federal felonies that undermine naturalization
You have grounds for serious sanctions against Evans and disciplinary action against every attorney at Nesenoff & Miltenberg who touched this case. These are not one-year suspension grounds. Attorney Streicher, as a former prosecutor, should have immediately recognized the criminal implications of his client’s published confessions and he is subject to the same Third Department Appellate Division that tried to disbar me (https://paragraph.com/@dunsmoor.eth/nogooddeed).
Instead, the firm chose to double down on demonstrably false claims.
The Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation has accepted the investigation complaint against Streicher and his supervisor but, in my humble opinion, every N&M attorney involved in this matter should be disbarred and I will seek to make that a reality. When lawyers ignore explicit warnings about client fraud and continue filing false statements, they become participants in the deception rather than officers of the court.
XI. Conclusion
Evans tried to weaponize the court system to silence me and failed spectacularly. His TRO was denied, his case was dismissed, and his own admissions of criminal conduct are now part of the official court record in Wisconsin.
The glorified paralegal’s empire of fraud continues to crumble, one court ruling at a time. His naturalization is now at risk, his false credentials are documented in court filings, and his legal team just demonstrated they can’t win a harassment case with a plaintiff who’s already confessed to federal crimes in his own book.
What’s next? Based on the DOJ’s June 2025 memorandum prioritizing denaturalization cases involving undisclosed criminal conduct, I suspect Evans’ troubles are just beginning. But that’s for another article coming out in early October…